What is in the 1996 Constitution of South Africa. The Bill of Rights sets out the fundamental rights of all South Africans, including the right to dignity and the right to equality. The Bill of Rights also states when rights may be limited.
Word burgers se regte beskerm of nie? Dit gaan nie net oor die Nuremberg kodes nie, maar reg tot lewe en veiligheid asook rassisme en diskriminasie teenoor blanke minderhede, waar verskeie wetgewing geïmplementeer is vir vernietiging. Elke volk het die reg om oor hulself te regeer.
CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH AFRICA
Section 12 provides for the right to freedom and security of the person
• Not to be forced to participate in medical or scientific experiments.
*
The Bill of Rights sets out the fundamental rights of all South Africans, including the right to dignity and the right to equality. The Bill of Rights also states when rights may be limited.
| Freedom and security of the person | ||||
| 12 | 1) | Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right  | ||
| a. | not to be deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without just cause; | |||
| b. | not to be detained without trial; | |||
| c. | to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources; | |||
| d. | not to be tortured in any way; and | |||
| e. | not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way. | |||
| 2) | Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right  | |||
| a. | to make decisions concerning reproduction; | |||
| b. | to security in and control over their body; and | |||
| c. | not to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent. | |||
https://www.westerncape.gov.za/legislation/bill-rights-chapter-2-constitution-republic-south-africa
*
RELATED INFORMATION
Unesco, Human Rights, Racism and the Nuremberg Code
*
Conversations with an attorney, Reiner Fuellmich about human rights, crime against humanity and specific the Nuremberg codes. There are various websites and videos about it. He is one of the founders of the Corona Investigative Committee who is spearheading the crimes against humanity global lawsuits, and who has been active in dismantling the ‘false Covid narratives’ on behalf of us all. His channel has many interviews with doctors and scientists from around the world who have been fired and defamed for speaking the truth.
Here are a few websites and relevant information about the “pandemic and corona virus”.
Starting Litigation for Crimes against Humanity Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Nuremberg 2.0 discussion with Reiner Fuellmich on covid trials french subtitles covid trials.
*
Videos
*
Channel
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=reiner+fuellmich&t=hd&va=u&iax=videos&ia=videos
Reiner Fuellmich is one of Germany’s most powerful lawyers, and is building a string of class action lawsuits globally, for “crimes against humanity”.
Dr Peter McCullough
https://iono.fm/e/1072778
*
Kilde:
https://sorendreier.com/1000-lawyers-and-10000-doctors-have-filed-a-lawsuit-for-violations-of-the-nurembergcode/
1,000 advokater och 10,000 läkare har inlämnat en stämningsansökan för brott mot Nürnbergkoden. Den nya Nürnberg-rättegången startar den 3 juli 2021 – Sista Tiden
READ THIS NOTICE …
Notice: Auto translated from Swedish.
1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Have Filed a Lawsuit for Violations of the Nuremberg Code
A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity. Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death – as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result. This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases / “infections” detected by the use of this incorrect test.
In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.
Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a serious breach of the Convention. The “experimental” vaccine violates all 10 Nuremberg codes – which carry the death penalty for those who try to break these international laws.
The following violations of the Nuremberg Code apply:
Nuremberg Code # 1: Voluntary consent is important
No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent. Many media, political and non-medical people urge people to take the injection. They do not provide information about the negative effects or dangers of this gene therapy. All you hear from them is – “safe and effective” and “the benefits outweigh the risks.”
Countries use blockades, coercion and threats to force people to take this vaccine or are banned from participating in free society under the mandate of a vaccine pass or Green Pass. During the Nuremberg trials, the media were also prosecuted and members were killed for lying to the public, along with many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of crimes against humanity.
Nuremberg Code # 2: Yields with fruitful results that cannot be produced by other means
As mentioned above, gene therapy does not meet the criteria for a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that give fruitful results against Covid, such as Ivermectin, vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc and strengthened immune system for flu and colds.
Nuremberg Code # 3: Basic experiments as a result of animal experiments and natural history disease
This gene therapy skipped animal experiments and went directly to human experiments. In mRNA research used by Pfizer – a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all monkeys developed pneumonia but the researchers considered the risk low because these were young healthy monkeys from 2-4 years of age. Israel has used Pfizer and the International Court of Justice has accepted a requirement that 80% of recipients with pneumonia should be injected with this gene therapy. Despite this alarming development, Pfizer continued to develop its mRNA for Covid, without animal testing.
Nuremberg Code # 4: Avoid all unnecessary suffering and injury
Since the launch of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system, over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in the United States. In the EU, more than 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a serious violation of this code.
Nuremberg Code # 5: No experiment should be performed if there is reason to believe that injury or death will occur
See No. 4, based on fact-based medical data, this gene therapy causes death and injury. Previous research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current experimental gene experiment. A 2002 study of SARS-CoV-1 nail proteins showed that they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots and inhibit Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this nail protein that inherits all these risks.
Nuremberg Code # 6: The risk should never exceed the benefit
Covid-19 has a recovery rate of 98-99%. Vaccine damage, death, and adverse side effects of mRNA gene therapy far outweigh this risk.
The use of “leaky” vaccines was banned for agricultural use by the US and the EU due to the Marek Chicken study which shows “hot viruses” and variants appear… make the disease even more deadly. Nevertheless, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC aware that the risk of new, more deadly variants arises from leaky vaccinations. The CDC is fully aware that the use of leaky vaccines facilitates the emergence of hotter (more deadly) strains. Yet they have ignored this when it comes to humans.
Nuremberg Code # 7: Preparations must be made for even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death
No preparations were made. This gene therapy skipped animal experiments. The pharmaceutical companies’ own clinical phase 3 studies will not end until 2022/2023. These vaccines were approved in an emergency.
Use only action to force on a misinformed public. They are NOT FDA approved.
Nuremberg Code # 8: Experiments must be carried out by scientifically qualified persons
Politicians, the media and actors who claim that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science. Many stores such as Walmart & drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer
experimental medical gene therapies to the uninformed public.
Nuremberg Code # 9: Everyone must have the freedom to end the experiment at any time
Despite the call from over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists and epidemiologists – the experiment does not end. In fact, there are currently many attempts to change laws to enforce vaccine compliance.
This includes mandatory and mandatory vaccinations. Experimental “sprayers” are planned every six months without using the growing number of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment. These update images will be administered without any clinical trials. Hopefully, this new Nuremberg trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.
Nuremberg Code # 10: The researcher must terminate the experiment at any time if there is a probable cause for injury or death
It is clear from statistical reporting data that this experiment leads to death and injury. But not all politicians, pharmaceutical companies and so-called experts make any attempt to stop this gene therapy experiment from harming a misinformed public.
Legal proceedings are progressing, evidence has been gathered and a large growing group of experts is sounding the alarm.
*
1,000 advokater och 10,000 läkare har inlämnat en stämningsansökan för brott mot Nürnbergkoden
PCR-testet utformades aldrig för att detektera patogener och är 100% felaktigt vid 35 cykler. Alla PCR-tester som övervakas av CDC är inställda på 37 till 45 cykler. CDC medger att test över 28 cykler inte är tillåtna för ett positivt tillförlitligt resultat.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result.
Die PCR -toets is nooit ontwerp om patogene op te spoor nie en is 100% onakkuraat tydens 35 siklusse. Alle PCR -toetse wat deur die CDC gemonitor word, is ingestel op 37 tot 45 siklusse. Die CDC erken dat toetse van meer as 28 siklusse nie ‘n positiewe, betroubare resultaat kan lewer nie.
Förutom de felaktiga testerna och bedrägliga dödscertifikat strider själva ”experimentella” vaccinet mot artikel 32 i Genèvekonventionen. Enligt artikel 32 i Genèvekonventionen från 1949 är ”stympning och medicinska eller vetenskapliga experiment som inte krävs för medicinsk behandling av en skyddad person” förbjuden. Enligt artikel 147 är genomföranden av biologiska experiment på skyddade personer ett allvarligt brott mot konventionen. Det ”experimentella” vaccinet bryter mot alla 10 Nürnbergkoder – som har dödsstraff för dem som försöker bryta mot dessa internationella lagar.
In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. According to Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a serious breach of the Convention. The “experimental” vaccine violates all 10 Nuremberg codes – which carry the death penalty for those who try to break these international laws.
Benewens die verkeerde toetse en bedrieglike sterftesertifikate, oortree die ‘eksperimentele’ entstof self artikel 32 van die Genève -konvensie. Volgens artikel 32 van die Geneefse Konvensie van 1949 is “verminking en mediese of wetenskaplike eksperimente wat nie nodig is vir die mediese behandeling van ‘n beskermde persoon nie” verbied. Volgens artikel 147 is die uitvoer van biologiese eksperimente op beskermde persone ‘n ernstige oortreding van die konvensie. Die ‘eksperimentele’ entstof oortree alle 10 Neurenberg -kodes – wat die doodstraf dra vir diegene wat hierdie internasionale wette probeer oortree.
There are more to read – FOLLOW IT HERE
1,000 advokater och 10,000 läkare har inlämnat en stämningsansökan för brott mot Nürnbergkoden
*
German Corona Investigative Committee
The strategy behind the planned US class action lawsuit is supported by the lawyers known from the Berlin “Corona Committee”. Above all, lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, LL.M. (UCLA) from Göttingen. He has been a litigator for 26 years, admitted to practice in Germany and California. He is a founding member of the “Corona Committee” foundation. Lawyer Antonia Fischer and Lawyer Dr. Justus Hoffmann from Berlin and lawyer Cathrin Behn from Göttingen are in charge of the German side.
Wer sind wir?
The EU is demanding the possibility of class action in all EU countries, unfortunately without success so far. A real class action is currently only available in the USA and is called / class action /. And now there is, as Dr. In his video, Fuellmich explains the possibility of bringing a class action lawsuit against the manufacturers and sellers of the defective product, PCR tests, there in the USA. Because the German Drosten test was based on a recommendation by the WHO as one of the first worldwide, including in the USA and used there.
Wie kann ich meine Ansprüche gerichtlich, und zwar ggf. auch im Rahmen einer Sammelklage (class action) in den USA geltend machen?
Sunlight July 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0gRGg7WgnI
*
The “Panic Paper” was leaked, which was written by the German Department of the Interior. Its classified content shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that, in fact, the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and mainstream media. The accompanying irresponsible statements of the Head of the RKI – remember the [German] CDC – Mr. Wieler, who repeatedly and excitedly announced that the corona measures must be followed unconditionally by the
population without them asking any question, shows that that he followed the script verbatim. In his public statements, he kept announcing that the situation was very grave and threatening, although the figures compiled by his own Institute proved the exact opposite.
The “Panic Paper” calls for children to be made to feel responsible – and I quote – “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow the corona rules”, that is, if they do not wash their hands constantly and don’t stay away from their grandparents.
Note
This is the most important part of our fact-finding: the PCR test is being used
on the basis of false statements, NOT based on scientific facts with respect to
infections. In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the
assertions of Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do NOT give any indication of an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-COV-2. Not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly emphasized. Instead, they’re simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.
That is: contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR-test result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive, it does NOT mean that they’re infected with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-COV-2 virus. Even the United States CDC, even this institution agrees with this, and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests, dated July 13, 2020.
First bullet point says: NOTE
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019 nCOV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Second bullet point says: “The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019 nCOV infection.” Third bullet point says: “This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”
Everything over 35 cycles is – as reported by the New York Times and others – considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable. However, the Drosten test, as well as the WHO-recommended tests that followed his example, are set to 45 cycles. Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?
Click to access Transcript-testimony-Reiner-Fuellmich-.pdf
*
“Panic paper”
Update on Dr Reiner Fuellmich Class Action Lawsuits Against Coronavirus Fraud
*
Professor Lothar H. Wieler is President of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the national public health institute in Germany. A veterinarian by training, Professor Wieler has focused his research on zoonotic diseases, that is, infections that are transmitted between animals and humans, which account for many newly emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases.
Professor Wieler is Deputy Spokesperson for the research consortium InfectControl 2020, which pursues intersectoral approaches to preventing and treating infections from a “One Health” perspective. Within InfectControl 2020, Wieler also heads the IRMRESS and Neobiom networks. IRMRESS researches innovative strategies to fight multidrug-resistant bacteria and aims to use next generation sequencing techniques to establish a molecular surveillance system. Neobiom identifies factors that change the microbiome, resistome and mycobiome of premature babies.
*
13 November 2020
Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with consumer protection trial lawyer Reiner Fuellmich to talk about the Coronavirus and his work on the German Corona investigation committee.
LISTEN TO THIS
This one is well worth watching, and sharing with all parents. If they can’t stand up for others, maybe they can find some courage to save children at least.
They want to FORCE this jab on all of us! If a large percentage refuse, their vile criminality will be exposed. The health outcomes now & in the future of the jabbed compared to the non-jabbed will be obvious & measurablE – the evidence will be irrefutable. Read & share this well-written explanation on the likely reason they want to force this death jab on the entire earthly population:
https://alt-market.us/why-are-
globalists-and-governments-so-desperate-for-100-vaccination-rates/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/c9lwTatw2uvN/
>
Fauci knew: Experimental Virus Drug Remdesivir Failed in Human Trial https://www.courthousenews.com/experimental-virus-drug-remdesivir-failed-in-human-trial/
Acute renal failure due to vancomycin toxicity in the setting of unmonitored vancomycin infusion https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5023302/
*
South Africa
Remdesivir could have a double impact and save thousands of lives
https://en.as.com/en/2020/07/08/latest_news/1594223072_744566.html
Remdesivir, a medicine which could make a difference in the management of severe COVID-19 disease, is available in South Africa now. Cipla obtained authorisation from the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (“SAHPRA”) to import this medicine under Section 21 of the Medicines and Related Substances Act. Cipla is working closely with SAHPRA and healthcare facilities to ensure access to remdesivir.
https://www.cipla.co.za/press-releases/covid-19-drug-remdesivir-arrives-in-sa
Agreement has been reached on a daily fee of up to 16,000 rand ($950) for COVID-19 patients that get treated in critical care beds in private hospitals, said Anban Pillay, the health ministry’s deputy director-general for national health insurance.
https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/hospitals/south-africa-government-private-hospitals-agree-deal-on-covid-19-patients/76251842
Drug manufacturer, CIPLA South Africa, has announced that Remdesivir, a medicine that could make a difference in the management of severe COVID-19, is now available in the country. Remdesivir has also been given the green light by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority.
https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/remdesivir-now-available-in-sa-for-covid-19-treatment/
Indian pharmaceutical major Hetero announces the launch of generic Remdesivir in South Africa for Covid-19 treatment.
https://www.heteroworld.com/pdf/Press-Release-Hetero-Announces-Launch-of-Remdesivir-in-South-Africa.pdf
https://www.news24.com/health24/medical/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/remdesivir-can-save-lives-and-shorten-time-in-icu-particularly-in-sa-researchers-say-20200714-6
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32628744/
https://www.medicalbrief.co.za/sas-private-hospitals-order-cut-price-remdesivir-generic-but-state-holds-back/
https://bhekisisa.org/health-news-south-africa/2020-09-03-this-covid-19-medicine-opened-a-pandoras-box-in-sa-find-out-why/
http://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Rapid-Review-of-Remdesivir-for-COVID-19-Update_15December2020.pdf
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/8/3/ofab040/6123859
http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/view/13086
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-04-01-sa-to-start-enrolling-patients-in-landmark-covid-19-trial/
A new study outlines how remdesivir could save lives in countries with less hospital capacity, such as South Africa, where COVID-19 is beginning to overwhelm intensive care units.
https://www.futurity.org/remdesivir-covid-19-treatment-2398822/
ONAFHANKLIK 
[…] Unesco, Human Rights, Racism and the Nuremberg CodeNuremberg codes … SA Constitution – Grondwet […]
LikeLike
[…] Nuremberg codes – SA Constitution – Grondwet […]
LikeLike
[…] *RELATED INFORMATION – BYKOMENDE INLIGTING : OPLOSSING IS SELFBESKIKKINGDO WE HAVE RIGHTS AS A PEOPLE – HET ONS AS VOLK DIE REG OM ONSSELF TE REGEERLees wat hier gebeur hetTuskegee Study 1932 in USAUnesco, Human Rights, Racism and the Nuremberg CodeNuremberg codes – SA Constitution – Grondwet […]
LikeLike
[…] Human Rights, Racism and the Nuremberg CodeNuremberg codes … SA Constitution – GrondwetBelmont Report […]
LikeLike