South Africa – Arson – Terrorisme – Brandstigting

What is the point of burning down infrastructure, schools, trucks and buildings – it won’t solve any problems and it will cost us, the taxpayer, the prices of products won’t come down, but will become more and more expensive.  It is not always only about labour but also things like to transport bread, clothes, furniture,  and other things from one place to another.   To bake bread you need certain ingredients.   To make PAP you need mielie meal.

*

Die werk van persone wat ‘n ekonomie wil skade berokken en totaal vernietig, word terroriste genoem.   Heelwat gaan dit oor hulself wat aan die top van die strukture wil wees om mag te bekom.   Sindikate wat opdragte ontvang die magte af wat ‘n land wil vernietig.     ‘n Obsessie om besighede ‘n groot terugslag toe te dien in die tydperk van inperking maak dit nog veel erger.  Hierdie vervoerbesighede trek reeds swaar om voort te bestaan.  Nou wie is die wenners hiermee?   Beslis nie die maatskappye of besighede nie.

Watter tipe inhoud is met die trokke wat so uitgebrand is vervoer – drank, voedsel of iets anders?

*

Who will repair this arson? – not the owner.   Who damaged the roads during those explosions and have to remove all those trucks?

What happened to all those truckdrivers when people just started to burn the truck he/she is driving.  This is not freedom but terrorism.

It is impossible it is only one person involved in this type of terrorism.  There was possibly an harassment to all those truck drivers.   But I can not imagine the trauma those drivers had to go through.   That is that person’s only income.   Those trucks are expensive to buy and maintain.  What if those people are not from outside our borders.   It was mentioned that it is possible that fleets making use of foreigners.  What happened to them?

*

Some South African truck drivers say they will risk their lives and continue working so they can feed their families. That’s despite the ongoing strike against trucking companies that hire non-South Africans. Drivers have dismissed the government’s plan to set up another task team to investigate the matter. Newzroom Afrika’s Malungelo Booi has more.

*

Police have launched a manhunt for the perpetrators who allegedly petrol-bombed nine trucks on the N3 and R103 near Heidelberg on Thursday night.

Gauteng police spokesperson Capt Mavela Masondo said preliminary investigations revealed that a white Toyota Quantum and a black VW vehicle, both with unknown registrations, had blocked the road. Then a number of trucks caught fire after petrol-bombs were allegedly thrown at them.

This occurred at about 8.30pm on Thursday.    “Seven trucks were torched on the N3 between Heidelberg and Vosloorus while two trucks were set alight on the R103.”

WATCH | Nine trucks petrol-bombed on N3 and R103 in Gauteng, police hunt for perps

One person has been arrested for the burning of trucks last night. The thugs were using a Toyota quantum to force trucks to slow down before petrol bombing them. We hope more arrests are made.

*

Truck drivers …

*

The civil rights organisation AfriForum says that the South African Human Rights Commission (HRC) cannot be trusted to facilitate talks between communities in South Africa, because the HRC promotes double standards and shrugs its shoulders when violence against minorities is romanticised. AfriForum therefore views the HRC as part of the problem in South Africa and not as part of the solution.

*

Truck Burnt During The South African Truck Drivers Strike

*

2019

Namibian Marshall Ranger, Sean Naude has condemned the violent attacks on foreign truck drivers in South Africa and urged all truck drivers to refrain from travelling to the country, as media reports show that locals are allegedly burning trucks with South African number plates, operated by foreigners.

*

Protest actions in South Africa not peaceful at all – the “reds EFF” promised no violence.

*

Hundreds of schools burnt down during lock down – 2020
Schools torched in South Africa

Waar is die veiligheid en beveiliging van al hierdie treinstasies heen, alles was in 1994 in plek?  Destyds was daar selfs ‘n Spoorwegpolisie.    Wie wen aan die einde met al hierdie tipe ekonomiese rewolusie en vernietiging?   Al wat opsigtelik is, is die verwisseling van ANC hande op alle vlakke van regering, bedoelende, sodra korrupsie beweer of iets kwansuis gedoen gaan word, word so iemand met ‘n ander een vervang en word “ondersoeke” van vooraf gedoen en verdere ondersoeke word eenvoudig vertraag.

Trains in SA  – Arson

*

Schools were burnt by their own peoples – 2020
Damaged Schools in South Africa – lockdown

*

Burning trucks – ongoing situation – 2019
Violence ongoing in South Africa – Trucks still burning

*

Dit is niks anders as terrorisme nie – Ernstige brandstigting en saakbeskadiging van eiendom.

Daarteenoor, is daar ander moontlikhede – BETALENDE inkomste vir die regering …    of dalk iemand anders?

Dis hoof terroriste wat agter die totale vernietiging van Suid-Afrika sit, maak waarskynlik gebruik daarom om ‘n paar “terroriste te huur” wat soveel trokke aan die brand steek en eenvoudig gewaarborg word om oor die grens te verdwyn.   Dieselfde gebeur met skole en treine of geboue.   Die hele ekonomie verdwyn soos die Titanic, waardeloos.

Hoeveel van hierdie terroriste wat die tipe van geweldige skade berokken en gepleeg het,  is al ooit in hegtenis geneem of vervolg?   En hoe gaan hierdie terroriste wat wel gevang is, vir die skades betaal?

Daar is meer hieromtrent betrokke wat soos ‘n legkaart inpas om meer en meer geld vir die regering te laat inpalm.     Versekerings en eise, aanvalle en moorde  – 15% VAT gaan na die regering toe.  Mediese onkostes.    Indien SASRIA ge-eis word – in tyd van terrorisme of terreur – is dit ook die regering wat betrokke is – SASRIA behoort aan die regering.

Die persoon of besigheid wat bestuur, se lewe word ontwrig en moet moontlik “aflegging” in die gesig staar as besighede toemaak as gevolg hiervan.    Die besigheid wie se trok dit is, verloor al die pad.    Dit sal interessant wees om te weet hoeveel van hierdie trok-eienaars (besighede) is swart bemagtiging.   Of gaan dit suiwer net oor immigrante wat trokbestuurders is?      Daar is tog heelwat van ons trokbestuurders wat oor ons grense ry en aflewerings in Afrika state doen, of gee bestuurders van Suid-Afrika die trokke af aan daardie betrokke land se bestuurders.

Die inhoud van die trok, is moontlik meer as een persoon of ‘n Boer sin , wat uitgebrand word.   Dus is dit nog verdere lewens wat verwoes word.     Besighede wat weens al hierdie skades, hul deure moet sluit.

Die inhoud van die trokke – die goedere wat dalk individueel bestel is van 50 of meer mense of besighede, verloor ook in die proses, want al hul artikels in daardie trok is vernietig.   Met aankope van hierdie artikels het hulle  15% VAT aan die regering betaal.

DUS hoeveel 15% VAT ontvang die regering as gevolg van versekerings en al hierdie brandstigting.   Dit geld ook vir al die geboue wat so in puin is, daar is soms waardevolle artikels wat onvervangbaar is.   Sommige is antieke geboue en selfs die inhoud is museumstukke, wat ook nooit vervang kan word nie.

*

Are we living now in a terrorist state in South Africa?

There are different views about  different acts that make it terrorism.

In November 2004, a Secretary-General of the United Nations report described terrorism as any act “intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants with the purpose of intimidating a population or compelling a government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act”.

State terrorism refers to acts of terrorism conducted by a state against its own citizens or against another state.

“Terrorism is the deliberate killing of innocent people, at random, to spread fear through a whole population and force the hand of its political leaders”  .

Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.

Terrorist acts frequently have a political purpose.  Some official, governmental definitions of terrorism use the criterion of the illegitimacy or unlawfulness of the act  to distinguish between actions authorized by a government (and thus “lawful”) and those of other actors, including individuals and small groups.

Those labeled “terrorists” by their opponents rarely identify themselves as such, and typically use other terms or terms specific to their situation, such as separatist, freedom fighter, liberator, revolutionary, vigilante, militant, paramilitary, guerrilla, rebel, patriot, or any similar-meaning word in other languages and cultures.     . .

Are Rewolution and terrorism the same?

The term terroriste, meaning “terrorist”, is first used in 1794 by the French philosopher  François-Noël Babeuf, who denounces Maximilien Robespierre‘s Jacobin regime as a dictatorship.

In the years leading up to what became known as the Reign of Terror, the Brunswick Manifesto threatened Paris with an “exemplary, never to be forgotten vengeance: the city would be subjected to military punishment and total destruction” if the royal family was harmed, but this only increased the Revolution’s will to abolish the monarchy.

Some groups, when involved in a “liberation” struggle, have been called “terrorists” by the Western governments or media. Later, these same persons, as leaders of the liberated nations, are called “statesmen” by similar  organizations. Two examples of this phenomenon are the Nobel Peace Prize  laureates Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism