Hawks -> Corruption

Dis eenvoudig: Misdaad is ‘n ekstra inkomste, nie net vir regering nie, maar instansies, maatskappye en burgers sien hul kom weg met korrupsie en doen dit eenvoudig weer. Korrupsie vier nog altyd hoogty in Suid-Afrika en is soos ‘n siekte wat wyer uitkring – wat beslis waar is. Daar word altyd gevra dat die publiek enige korrupsie of misdaad rapporteer, maar indien dit gebeur, wat gebeur dan met daardie persone? Die wat die misdaad pleeg word nie fisies werklik ondersoek nie of selde vervolg. Skuldiges word soms van een maatskappy na ‘n ander een “verplaas”. Wat dus gedoen word , name van korrupsie eenhede wat ondersoeke doen word verander en dan “verdwyn” inligting in ‘n bodemlose put weens “tydsverloop” of inligting wat wegraak. Hande en koffers beskerm mekaar al sedert 1994 op alle vlakke van regering en ook in privaat sektor. Die “wil” om die korrupsie totaal uit te roei , bestaan glad nie in ons hele land nie. Dit vernietig ons as volk, want baie kom al etlike jare uit ons belastingbydraers se sakke uit.   Waar bestaan daar ‘n “onafhanklike regsbank” of selfs vervolgings, sommige vervolgings het dubbel reëls wat toegepas word.  Ons het ook menseregte, maar alles word vernietig !! Selfbeskikking (onafhanklikheid) is al uitweg.

24 January 2008 – ANC RULES

First, the ANC resolution at the Polokwane conference states that the Directorate of Special Operations (Scorpions) must be dissolved and members of the DSO performing policing functions must fall under the South African Police Services because the “constitutional imperative that there be a Single Police Service should be implemented”.

As the Kamphephe Commission of inquiry pointed out, this means that there is not constitutional imperative to have only one prosecuting authority for the country. By analogy it would also mean that there is no constitutional imperative to have all investigative functions performed by the SAPS. The ANC resolution calling for the abolishment of the Scorpions is therefore based on a misunderstanding of the Constitution.

Second, it is often said that there is no political oversight of the Scorpions and that its investigative function should really be overseen by the Minister of Safety and Security. But section 31 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act creates a Ministerial Coordination Committee, comprising of the ministers of Justice,Correctional Services, Defence, Intelligence Service, Safety and Security and any other Cabinet Minister appointed by the President.

This means a mechanism does exist for political oversight and co-ordination of the Scorpions but the Minister of Justice complained to the Kamphephe Commission that it had not met for four years. This is a bit absurd, seeing that the Minister would be the one to make sure that such a Committee meet and do its work so she was in effect complaining that her Department was not doing its job.

Re-reading the National prosecuting Authority Act I was also intrigued to note that the Scorpions are legislatively empowered only to investigate organised crime, which is admittedly broadly defined to include crimes of an ongoing fashion like those associated with a “generally corrupt relationship” between two people.

The President can, however, broaden the scope of Scorpion investigations by proclamation in the Government Gazette. I have not been able to obtain such a proclamation but I would imagine the wings of the SCorpions to investigate individual ANC members could be clipped quite successfully by just having the President revoke this proclamation and getting the Scorpions to focus narrowly on organised crime through work done by the Ministerial Coordination Committee.

One question to ask is why was this not done? The Zumaites will argue that it was not done because Mbeki wanted to use the Scorpions to settle political scores. The Mbekites will argue that the President is just concerned about corruption no matter where it might be found and was just following the law.

But all the subtleties are of course being lost in the highly emotive drive by some crooks in the NEC to get rid of the one body who has shown that it would – at least sometimes – fearlessly go after people in high places. If we are lucky these subtleties will emerge during the Parliamentary process that will now have to be followed to abolish the Scorpions.

In any event, by looking at the Constitutional Court judgments and the NPA ACT it is clear that the reasons given by the ANC NEC’s for abolishing the Scorpions hold no water. This reinforces the idea that this move is really a naked power grab by people who think they should be abovce scrutiny and hence above the law.



Corruption 2012 (Moneyweb)

A disease of the system that needs to be stamped out. This is how minister of finance Pravin Gordhan described corruption in South Africa at the recent Discovery Invest Leadership Summit.   The Scorpions were established in 2002 while a lot of successes were achieved through this unit that was housed under the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).

It was under the Directorate of Special Investigations (DSO or Scorpions as it was known), that a number of high profile investigations and cases illustrated how crucial the unit was.

The DSO was first in South Africa to convict financial directors of fraud, tackle 
major international corporate raiding in conjunction with the UK and USA, and 
register money-laundering and racketeering convictions. The unit was key in arresting suspects in the Brett Kebble murder. Some of the other investigations highlighted in the media included the travel fraud prosecutions that resulted in 38 cases against members of Parliament being 
concluded. The Shaik and Yengeni rulings and the Selebi and Agliotti cases all originated with the Scorpions.

The unit had a conviction rate of between 82% and 94%.    During  2002 there were 66 people  arrested and during 2006 more – 617. In 2002 180 prosecutions were finalised. In 2006 this was 214.

But in June 2008 the Scorpions was disbanded and a total of 287 DSO cases were transferred to the new Directorate for Priority Crime (or Hawks), which falls under the South African Police Service (SAPS).

One case study, however, raises concern over what happened to these transferred cases.

Francois Nortje has been struggling to get a case of possible corruption investigated since reporting it back in 2005. He said there was finally some progress made back in 2008 with the Scorpions and then he was told the case was being transferred to the new Directorate for Priority Crime.   Since then he has been struggling, with legal help, to find out whether the case is being investigated. No one has contacted him for a statement on the matter.   Nortje says he has been trying to do what Gordhan suggests, but that it is a struggle.

“This is worrying. It gives one the impression that it is just lip service when politicians say they are serious about corruption. It’s been years where I send letters and queries, with all the necessary detail on an annual basis and nothing gets done,” he says.

The case he wants investigated includes the same players that were highlighted in newspaper articles earlier this year around Manaka Property Investments.

Manaka is a property company co-owned by among others Parliament’s finance portfolio head, Thaba Mufamadi and has as a director former Limpopo Tender Board chairperson, Jannie Moolman. The company leases property to government departments and has gained the attention of Parliament’s ethics watchdog.

The 287 cases that were transferred from the Scorpions in 2008 were evaluated and reassigned.

“These projects were subjected to an evaluation in determining the nature of each project, the status of each project, the resources that are required to finalise investigations and the allocation of the projects within the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) for finalisation,” the SAPS 2009/2010 Annual Report reads.

Ultimately 17 cases were transferred to be investigated in terms of the Organised Crime Project Investigation (OCPI) approach; 164 cases transferred to the Commercial Crime units for completion of the investigation; 48 cases transferred to the Organised Crime units for completion of the investigation; 55 cases were found to be ready for closure and three cases awaited approval for closure during the transfer process.

Up until that time 261 suspects were arrested during the investigation of these cases resulting in 38 convictions.

An answer in parliament to a question from the DA around the current status of these cases show that of the 127 cases that were under investigation or on the court roll only ten cases were still under investigation as projects. In total 24 cases were finalised at court with convictions, seven cases were withdrawn at court and 86 cases were still on the court roll.

This seems to show that a lot of progress has been made, but Nortje says he is still struggling just to get confirmation that someone is investigating the matter that he brought to the attention of the authorities. He received a letter from the deputy director-general of the NPA in March to inform him that a Brigadier Pieterse of the DCPI would be able to assist him as the case was transferred to it. The office of the Brigadier forwarded his query through to a Brigadier Moodley. Nortje has not received any further word.

The first hurdle when trying to report on the efficiency and capacity of the Hawks is that it is a struggle to contact them.

No numbers for the division specifically are readily available and a call to the SAPS could land you in a maze of transferred calls or busy signals.

Questions were submitted to the spokesperson for the Hawks, McIntosh Polela, but a week later no answers were received.

Ever since the Scorpions was disbanded there has been debate around the possible lack of independence of the Hawks. This year the South African Police Service Amendment Bill was referred to the Police Portfolio Committee for consideration. The Bill is a result of a Constitutional Court ruling (the so-called Glenister Judgement), which found that the Hawks was open to political interference by senior politicians and that this must be remedied in legislation.

Dianne Kohler Barnard, shadow minister of police for the DA, told Moneyweb that the Hawks would never be independent as it falls under the wrong structure. She said that there have been cases where a commercial crime has a link to a politician and the case just drags on forever.   She also says that the Scorpions were very efficient and that the Hawks is not matching these standards.

The latest SAPS Annual Report shows that only 35% of crimes investigated by the DPCI has court ready case dockets – for commercial crimes the percentage is even lower at only 25.6%.

“Where the Scorpions had a conviction rate between 82% and 94%, the Hawks are managing detection rates of around 50% and court ready percentages that are lower. It was a disservice that we did this country when the Scorpions were disbanded,” she said.



Scorpions : 2008 (dismantled)

Laat 'n boodskap

Verskaf jou besonderhede hieronder of klik op 'n logo om in te teken:

WordPress.com Logo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by WordPress.com. Log Out /  Verander )

Google photo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Google. Log Out /  Verander )

Twitter picture

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Twitter. Log Out /  Verander )

Facebook photo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Facebook. Log Out /  Verander )

Connecting to %s