Expropriation in South Africa – Sisulu

Expropriation means to expropriate everything – all properties are included here, to take it, without compensation – that is what government wants to implement – and that is #bolshevism.   Especially, if you are white and you own a property, a business, a company, a tour agency,  engineering, farming,  shares in any company,  vehicles used for your businesses, it is included to expropriate – read it with their ANC constitution.    That want to expropriate without compensation and change the so-called democratic constitution.

FILE:  Human Settlement Minister Lindiwe Sisulu. Picture: GCIS.

*

The government of South Africa, with their left wing parties in parliament will make sure they expropriate everything – same happened in Zimbabwe too.   Who stopped them in our neighbouring country? 

Nobody.

*

Not to mention that we are in the same boat as those citizens in Zimbabwe.    That is why there are so much crime and killings in South Africa.    The ANC with the (white) liberals and classical liberals, all together with George Soros and Renwick, planned it already before the Dakar “negotiations” and the so-called “democratic Kodesa constitution” before 1994.

Soros is one of the biggest financers, with OSF.SA and Cato Institute….   Soros funded Dakar and Kodesa.

*

Look at the murder rates in Zimbabwe since that was make “legal”.    The process of state-sanctioned land grab was given further momentum when another parliamentary motion was passed on.

Read what happened in Zimbabwe as well:    Most of the blacks will know what was going on in Zimbabwe, but do they really know about the thousands of black on black killings?     

AND THAT IS LIKE DURING THE 1810-1840 MFECANE WARS

There are a lot of information about those killings.

*

 

The Gukurahundi was a series of massacres of Ndebele civilians carried out by the Zimbabwe National Army from early 1983 to late 1987.  To ward off evil spirits, Jochonia Moyo picks wild herbs as he returns to Bhalagwe detention camp, the site of unimaginable brutality during a series of massacres more than 30 years ago that still haunts Zimbabwe today.   Here, Moyo was detained, beaten with clubs and forced to abuse other prisoners as Robert Mugabe’s soldiers embarked on an orgy of killing that left an estimated 20,000 dead in just two years.  The massacres occurred in the early 1980s but for decades were discussed only in hushed voices.

Massacres – Gukurahundi Zimbabwe

*
Who gave the orders?

Robert Mugabe (Shona) gee in Januarie 1983 opdragte aan sy eie opgeleide 5de Brigade van “noord-korea” om Ndebele’s uit te wis.   In January of 1983 Robert Mugabe, a member of the ethnic Shona majority, ordered his North Korea-trained Fifth Brigade to carry out what he called a gukurahundi against the Ndebele people.   From January 1983, a campaign of terror was waged against the Ndebele people in Matabeleland in western Zimbabwe. The so-called Gukurahundi massacres remain the darkest period in the country’s post-independence history, when more than 20,000 civilians were killed by Robert Mugabe’s feared Fifth Brigade.

Gukurahundi (Zimbabwe)

*
They were also tortured and killed because they were not with Mugabe.  Massas of them.   Was that for the land or the minerals at the end, with no food to eat today?  We are on the same road as Zimbabwe.
Erg getraumatiseerd omdat hul eie geliefdes voor hul vermink, vermoor en soms met ‘n mes oopgeslag is soos wat ‘n bok of bees afgeslag word.   Hul babas uitgeslag is en so gelaat om te sterf.    Hulle is gemartel en aan die brand gesteek of opgekap en in massagrafte gegooi

Gukurahundi – Zimbabwe

*

Did you know there in Zimbabwe are also Trustlands (homelands) as in South Africa.  Most of the British colonies are in line with this “policies” like that was created in 1854 in southern Africa – Shepstone Policy – just after the Mfecane wars.

Zimbabwe

***

The ANC have enough votes to change their own liberal 1955 manifesto (constitution) to get all land and everything they want,  for free (without compensation).  The millions of immigrants from Africa are also included here to be part of the “public interest”.   Where do they live today?   Around us all.

Immigrants  are already here to receive more and more land, houses, schools, medical aid, grants, etc – all for free.   They think so.   That is why the deputy minister (Police) already said that some areas have already 70-80% population  of immigrants and he referred to certain areas in Witwatersrand.

HUMAN SETTLEMENTS

Human Settlements Minister Lindiwe Sisulu (photo) has voiced her satisfaction with the draft legislation on the expropriation of land without compensation already having been published.

Sisulu said she hoped the process could be fast-tracked.   While introducing her department’s budget vote, Sisulu said her department would like to be the first to benefit from this legislation.   She said she is very glad that Parliament has finally got to this point where they will be able to expropriate land and she would like to be the first taker.

The draft legislation determines that land would not be expropriated without compensation for any other reason except for public interest.    She also said that there is any greater public interest than that they represent in Human Settlements.

Sisulu said government has delivered more than four million houses in housing opportunities.  They do not know exactly how many houses were already built, and how many of them belong to immigrants and not to citizens of South Africa.

***

They can not claim they are landless, because that is a lie.

*

South Africa’s residential property market forms the largest component of the South African property market, comprising most of the property assets within the country. By the end of 2017, the South African deeds registry had 7.2 million properties, worth R6.8 trillion (US$472 billion). Of this, about R5.1 trillion (US$354 billion) is in the residential sector, involving approximately 6.37 million registered properties. Just over half (57 percent) of the total formal residential property market is found in the eight metropolitan municipalities.

RDP – Housing Finance in South Africa

*

The South African Government, with all their co-partners and communist shoes, the EFF, ACDP, DA, VF+ (all multi-culture parties), together with the liberal whites of Dakar, Codesa writers,  created more racism and discrimination with all their B-BBEE legislations, including the expropriation of property without compensation.  The conservatives are projected as their scapegoats.

Therefore, it is just impossible that groups of Blacks or even other coloureds (Khoisan) are landless.   Various immigrants also took over subsidized RDP houses after 1994 – therefore how many of those houses were sold to the immigrants.  Landclaims… Trustlands … 8840 traditional leaders !!

Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa (CAHF)

*

Who are the real owners of state-owned land?   If it is state owned land, why do the government keep the land in their own hands and create this hate agenda against whites to reform?   What funding was paid (TAX) for that farmlands?  If tax was used,  the owners of all those farmland are the tax payers and not the government? 

State-owned land – 25 years later

*

GOVERNMENT IS OWNER OF MORE THAN 5000 PREVIOUSLY PRODUCTIVE FARMS AND MORE – ownership of properties.

Grond eienaars: ANC regeringsplase

****

So many articles said there are 7.6 million (2019) registered properties, but 2-3 articles (Afrika check) said there are only  4.7 million.   Afrika check is also funded by Open Society – George Soros.

They can not claim they are landless.   

BUT THEY ALL SAY THEY ARE LANDLESS

THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE

***

Claim: Since 1994, over 4.7 million free houses have been built, benefiting over 14 million people. This has meant a massive extension of home ownership, growing the productive assets of our people.

Government often refers to “housing opportunities” when reporting on delivery.

Housing opportunities and houses built are not the same because housing opportunities include serviced sites – plots of land – without houses.

The department of human settlements provided this breakdown of housing opportunities delivered from 1994 to last year. (The figures for April to December 2018 are preliminary.)

Housing Opportunities

Houses built include subsidised houses, rental accommodation, hostel upgrades and council houses where ownership was granted. If both a serviced stand and a house are provided, these count as one housing opportunity.

Spokesperson Xolani Xundu said the Enhanced Extended Discount Benefit Scheme “provides state subsidies to repair and/or rehabilitate, and even demolish and rebuild where necessary, government [rental] houses built before 1994 and then transfer houses into the ownership of legitimate occupants”.

Asked about the source of the number in the claim, the ANC said the “more than 4.7 million” in fact referred to housing opportunities and not houses built.

It said it would make this “clearer” in the online version of the manifesto.

Who benefited?

The manifesto claims that “more than” 14 million people benefited from the delivery of free houses.

If the number of housing opportunities provided (4.8 million) is multiplied by the average household size (3.3 according to the 2016 Community Survey), it comes to 15.8 million. However, it would not be correct to say that this number of people benefited from “free houses” because housing opportunities include serviced stands without houses. 

(NO change there is only 1 child)

Marie Huchzermeyer, a professor at Wits University’s School of Architecture and Planning, previously told Africa Check that an uncritical celebration of numbers should be avoided. She highlighted concerns such as the fact that “so many of these houses have been placed in very poor urban environments”, as well as the service-delivery burden placed on municipalities.

Verdict: Incorrect

The claim that “more than 4.7 million free houses” have been built since 1994 is incorrect. A total of 3.3 million housing units were built and not all of them were free.

The ANC did provide responses to our questions about the sources of claims in its manifesto, but the party did not make use of an opportunity to comment on our findings.

  • This package is part of a journalism partnership with Africa Check, the continent’s leading fact-checking organisation. The project aims to ensure that claims made by those in charge of state resources and of delivering essential services are factually correct. In the run-up to this year’s national and provincial elections, it is increasingly important that voters are able to make informed decisions.

 

2 gedagtes oor “Expropriation in South Africa – Sisulu”

Laat 'n boodskap

Verskaf jou besonderhede hieronder of klik op 'n logo om in te teken:

WordPress.com Logo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by WordPress.com. Log Out /  Verander )

Google photo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Google. Log Out /  Verander )

Twitter picture

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Twitter. Log Out /  Verander )

Facebook photo

Jy lewer kommentaar met jou rekening by Facebook. Log Out /  Verander )

Connecting to %s