They refer to several arguments from their international complaint, on grounds of the following violations:
• Torturing allowed by the state and judge for more than 11 years.
• Their right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
• Their right of equality before the law and not to be arbitrarily prosecuted.
• The violation of their right to legal representation, because Dr. Lets Pretorius was 9 months and Drs. Johan and Wilhelm Pretorius were 1 year and 7 months unrepresented during the trial while it continued. The state further refused them legal representation during their appeal process.
• Their privilege during the trial due to unlawful monitoring by the state as well as multiple confiscations of their privilege documentation by the state.
• That the trial judge Eben Jordaan was not impartial.
• That the sentence was shocking and only focused on retribution and punishment.
2011
The North Gauteng High Court, in Pretoria, has ordered that four of the Boeremag treason-trial accused may no longer be held in leg irons overnight. Judge Andre Louw granted the urgent court order on Monday following an application by the accused, Mike du Toit, Herman van Rooyen, Tom Vorster and Rudi Gouws. He also ordered that correctional services must immediately return their laptop computers to them. The four complained that they were sleep deprived and unable to concentrate on legal argument by their counsel in court or to give proper instructions because they were forced to sleep in leg irons with the lights on at night. They also complained their laptops contained privileged instructions to their legal representatives. They said correctional services had never given them any reasons for extending their period in isolation and shackles from seven to 30 days.
Draconian’ measures
Counsel for the four Piet Pistorius argued that the “draconian” measures were unnecessary, as the four were already being held in a high security section within the jail, where they were guarded 24 hours a day. “It is inhumane treatment to force an inmate to sleep in shackles at night,” he said. Correctional services opposed the application, saying the Correctional Services Act and regulations authorised them to restrain inmates, who tried to escape, in this manner.
Solly Sithole SC argued on behalf of correctional services that the four were at the top of the list of high-risk inmates and were not the only ones who were kept in isolation and shackles. “It’s a question of branding of an inmate as a high-risk inmate,” he said. Louw said he had to accept that the four said they could not sleep properly at night. He said correctional services may have acted within the Act and regulations, but still had to justify the extension of the measures in terms of the Constitution, and had not given reasons for the extension. It also did not give any reasons why the accused’s laptop computers should not be returned to them. Louw ordered each party to pay its own costs.
Failed escape bid
The four, together with the elderly Vis Visagie, staged a failed escape bid during a tea break at the court last month, but were all recaptured shortly thereafter. Visagie was rushed to hospital after collapsing at court the next day. He is still in hospital after undergoing heart surgery. Du Toit was also absent from court on Monday as he was being treated for injuries apparently sustained during the escape bid. Six of the other incarcerated accused have, meanwhile, also threatened to launch an urgent application as they had to appear in court in leg irons and lost all of their privileges along with the five who tried to escape. Van Rooyen and Gouws were previously on the run for eight months after escaping from the court cells in 2008. The state has asked for the conviction of all 20 accused on the main charge of high treason, arguing that a right-wing plot to violently overthrow the government was continuing to this day.
https://mg.co.za/article/2011-06-13-govt-told-to-remove-boeremag-accuseds-nighttime-leg-irons
***
Boeremag – Affidavit – Deon Loots
https://archive.org/stream/SwornAffidavitByDeonLoots/Sworn%20Affidavit%20by%20Deon%20Loots#page/n11/mode/2up
Boer Political Prisoners SA – Wilhelm Pretorius – Affidavit
SA Boeremaglede – Political Prisoners
Boeremag – Boer Political Prisoners
Boeremag verhoor – 23 Maart 2019
***
Agtergrond … Background
Rapport – “The first treason trial in South African history post apartheid regime is under way amid high security at the Pretoria High Court, with a group of alleged white supremacists accused of trying to overthrow the African National Congress (ANC) led government.”
19 JUNIE 2019 – Die Pretorius familie, wat betrokke is in die Boeremagsaak, bring op 18 Junie 2019 ’n aansoek in die Hooggeregshof te Pretoria waarin hulle die regmatigheid van hulle aanhouding bevraagteken en vra dat hulle vrygelaat moet word, alternatiewelik tydelik vrygelaat word hangende hulle klagte wat hulle by die Verenigde Nasies (VN) se Menseregte Komitee ingedien het. Hulle is in 2002 gearresteer en op 29 Oktober 2013 in Pretoria se Hooggeregshof tussen 30 en 35 jaar vonnisse van gevangenisstraf opgelê vir hoogverraad.
Op 5 Junie 2018 het Dr. Lets Pretorius deur prof. Hercules Booysen, ’n internasionaal erkende volkeregkenner, ’n klagte ingedien by die kantoor van die Menseregte Komitee, wat op 2 Julie 2018 deur hulle aanvaar is. Die twee broers, drs. Johan en Wilhelm Pretorius het hulle klagte ingedien op 22 Julie 2018, wat op 3 Desember 2018 aanvaar is. Hulle klagtes by die VN is gegrond op die Opsionele Protokol tot die Internasionale Verdrag van Siviele en Politieke Regte waartoe die Republiek van Suid-Afrika homself ná 1994 verbind het. In die klagtes vra hulle onmiddellike vrylating asook kompensasie vir die 17 jaar se onregmatige aanhouding. Hulle voer aan dat hulle verhoor onregverdig is aangesien dit byna al die minimum menseregte waarborge tot ’n regverdige verhoor verbreek het. Weens die feit dat die verhoor onregverdig was, is die aanhouding onwettig.
Die res van die onregmatighede word aan die hof getoon om aan te dui dat hulle ’n baie sterk kans het op vrylating deur die VN se Menseregte Komitee. Hulle vra alternatiewelik tydelike vrylating om die skade en verdere skending van hulle regte wat hulle verduur weens die onregmatige aanhouding te beperk, hangende die afhandeling van hulle klagte by die VN. Hulle voer aan dat die skendings van hulle verhoor so ooglopend ’n verbreking was van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika se internasionale verpligtinge, dat die Komitee nie tot ’n ander beslissing sal kom as dat hulle onregmatig aangehou word nie. Die saak by die Verenigde Nasies kan so lank as vier jaar duur voordat dit afgehandel sal wees. Dit beteken dat hulle dan vir 21 jaar in aanhouding sal wees met die baie goeie kans om vrygespreek te word. Dit sou beteken dat hulle 21 jaar onregmatig in aanhouding sou wees. Hulle verwys na enkele punte wat hulle in hulle klagte geopper het:
- Marteling wat deur die staat en regter toegelaat is vir meer as 11 jaar.
- Hulle reg om onskuldig deur ’n hof geag te word totdat skuldig bevind is.
- Hulle reg op gelykheid voor die reg en om nie arbitrêr vervolg te word nie.
- Die skending van reg op regsverteenwoordiging aangesien dr Lets Pretorius 9 maande en drs. Johan en Wilhelm vir 1 jaar en 7 maandesonder regsverteenwoordiger was, terwyl die strafsaak aangegaan het. Verder het die staat geweier om regshulp aan hulle te verskaf tydens hulle appèl proses.
- Hulle regsprivilegie weens die feit dat hulle herhaaldelik afgeluister is en hulle geprivilegeerde dokumentasie herhaaldelik deur die staat op beslag gelê is.
- Dat die verhoorregter Eben Jordaan nie onpartydig was nie.
- Dat die vonnis skokkend en onwettig was met slegs vergelding en straf as maatstaf.
***
9 Augustus 2019
deur Hercules
‘n Sisyphus-verhoor en as die rekords spat: Die Boeremag!
*
Mag ek begin met ‘n baie geluk aan my kliënt in die tronk? Hy het dit reggekry om op sy eie weer ‘n eerste in die geskiedenis van Suid-Afrika daar te stel en ek het so ‘n vermoede dit gaan nie sy – en ons -laaste wees soos die rekords spat en die regsgeskiedenis herskryf word nie!
*
Baie geluk Wilhelm met die geboorte van Jan-Arend Pretorius! Ek is seker almal wat jou ken, of weet van jou, haal hulle hoedens hoog af!
*
Vaderskap uit ‘n maksimum gevangenis! Dit is die eerste keer dat ‘n kind wettiglik verwek is deur ‘n persoon in ‘n maksimum gevangenis in die geskiedenis van Suid-Afrika! En dit is net met volharding en met kennis wat dit behaal is. Die gevangenisreëls moes wyk en plek maak vir volharding en dodelike navorsing wat gelei het tot die aanpassing van die reëls.
*
Uiteraard is dit nie die enigste rekord so ver nie. Die Boeremagsaak was alreeds met die vonnisoplegging in Oktober 2013 die langste en duurste saak in die geskiedenis van Suid-Afrika. ‘n Saak volgens die internasionale reg kom eers tot ‘n einde as die reg van appèl uitgeoefen is. Hiervolgens galop die duur van die saak nog rustig aan en is dit besig om elke dag ‘n wêreldrekord te verbeter as die langste voortdurende saak in die geskiedenis van die wêreld sover soos ons kon vasstel.
*
‘n Ander rekord wat ek wil voorhou, is dat dit die eerste saak in die wêreldgeskiedenis is sover soos my kennis strek waar dit bewysbaar is dat elke internasionale reël wat op ‘n strafverhoor van toepassing is, deur die verhoorregter verbreek is. As dit nie in wêreldrekord is nie, wil ek dit graag vereer met ‘n Suid-Afrikaanse rekord maar as klad op die Suid-Afrikaanse regsgeskiedenis.
*
Dit is ook die eerste saak wat sekerlik die langste martelingsrekord het in die regsgeskiedenis van Suid-Afrika indien nie in die wêreld nie. Hierdie bepaalde kliënt, soos ook vele andere, was elke slag in hand en voetboeie geplaas en in die voertuie ingehelp – lees ook maar ingewerp – elke hofdag vir elf jaar. Volgens die internasionale regspraak is dit marteling. Volgens die Suid-Afrikaanse reg was hulle in die gevangenis op ‘n bevel van die verhoorhof. Die verhoorhof het geweet hoe hulle vervoer word en dat beserings daaruit ontstaan het. Die verhoorregter het niks daaromtrent gedoen nie maar net soos die spreekwoordelike aap gemaak: Ek wil nie hoor of sien nie. Gemartel met ‘n hof se inskiklikheid? Moet ‘n rekord wees. Of hoe? Elf jaar lank! Meer as ‘n duisend maal!
*
Ek verstaan dis ‘n misdaad om diere in kettings aan te hou. Maar mense? En waar was die gedreun van die menseregte-handhawers? As dit diere was wat so vervoer was, sou die diereliefhebbers dalk gekla het. Nou was dit nie. Is dit nie dalk ‘n rekord vir swye nie?
*
Die laaste rekord is sekerlik die feit dat ‘n man in ‘n maksimum gevangenis sy eie regsadviseur het en al vir bykans, sal ons maar sê, nege jaar. Elke dag kom daardie oproep ongeag van afstand en plek: “Hallo oom, dis Wilhelm hier.”
*
Nogmaals baie geluk Wilhelm en Riëtte!
*
Wat sal ons leuse wees? Illuc vadis! Op pad na geregtigheid!
*
Groetnis
*
(En ja, Suid-Afrika se verdraaiings van die feite en die reg is alreeds geantwoord in Genève. O ja, ons klagte in Genève is dalk ook die langste in die wêreld se geskiedenis!)
***
RAPPORT …
- 2002
- 30 October, Just after midnight on 30 October 2002 eight bomb blasts rocked Soweto. Seven of the blasts occurred on main commuter railway lines running through the township. The damage to the railway lines was estimated at approximately R2 million.
- 31 October, South African Defence Minister Mosiuoa Lekota says that a small extremist white group in the armed forces and police could be behind the bombing in Soweto. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2383795.stm)
- 11 November, Right-wing group, the Boeremag claimsresponsibility for a series of bombings in the black township of Soweto. The Boeremag sent an e-mail to the Afrikaans language “Beeld” newspaper saying it had planted the bombs which killed a woman and injured her husband on 30 October.
- November, Arrest of 26 men alleged to be Boeremag members. About 1000kg of explosives found.
- 2003
- 19 May, A Boeremag treason trial starts amid high security at the Pretoria High Court, but it is postponed at the request of defence lawyers, who asked for time to sort out legal matters for their clients.Thirteen of the men challenge the court’s jurisdiction, claiming the government is illegitimate.
- 26 May, Judge Eben Jordaan granted a postponement after the Legal Aid Board undertook to reconsider applications for assistance from the accused. The trial was postponed till 9 June 2003.
- 17 June, The treason trial of 22 alleged Boeremag members is postponed for the fourth time over unresolved legal aid issues.
- 05 August, 13 of the 22 treason accused entered a special plea that the court has no jurisdiction over them.
- 2004
- 30 January, The Boeremag treason trial heard that some of the tape recordings secretly made by police during several Boeremag meetings may be usable. This was despite earlier claims by the prosecution that all of the tapes, which police spy Johan C. Smit claimed he had helped to make, were inaudible and could not be used.
- 12 February, The possibility of obtaining a formula for poison to put into water reservoirs in black townships had been discussed at a Boeremag meeting, a police spy tells the Pretoria High Court. Smit, the “shadow Boer” who claimes he had infiltrated the Boeremag’s inner circle while secretly spying for the police, makes this claim during cross-examination by Daan Mostert, who represents alleged Boeremag member Adriaan van Wyk.
- 13 February,A statement by a police spy, Smit and state witness in the Boeremag treason trial concerning an unrelated murder investigation resulted in heated argument and an application to gag the media.
- 04 October, One of the Boeremag treason trial accused is rushed to a district surgeon after apparently suffering a nervous breakdown in the Pretoria High Court.
- 08 October, The Boeremag treason trial is delayed in the Pretoria High Court after an alleged dispute between suspected leader Tom Vorster and a fellow accused.
- 19 October, The fourth state witness in the Boeremag treason trial will not be able to maintain his anonymity after the judge refused an application to keep his identity a secret. Pretoria High Court Judge Eben Jordaan says the witness, Deon Crous, had not proved the existence of exceptional circumstances to warrant such an order, which would limit the freedom of the press.
- 21 October, A witness in the Boeremag treason trial describes preparations for a coup attempt, including renting cars for car bombs, stockpiling ammunition and making petrol bombs with beer bottles and government-issue condoms.
26 October, Self-confessed coup plotter Deon Crous testifies in the Pretoria High Court that he and five of the Boeremag accused had decided to assassinate former SA President, Nelson Mandela with a home-made bomb after reading in a newspaper that he would open a school near Tzaneen in Limpopo. A bucket containing ammonium nitrate, diesel, a detonator and timing device was placed in the road and would have been set off when the group saw Mandela’s car coming down the road. The plan is abandoned when Mandela arrives at the school by helicopter. - 28 October, Boeremag members had prayed and assured each other they were doing the right thing before planting bombs in Soweto in October 2002, the treason trial in Pretoria High Court heard.
- Self-confessed coup plotter Deon Crous tells the court he and five of the Boeremag – Herman van Rooyen, Rudi Gouws and the Pretorius brothers Johan, Kobus and Wilhelm – had planned and planted 10 bombs at a bridge, railway lines, a mosque and a taxi rank in the Soweto area.
- 29 October, Deon Crous tells Pretoria High Court he helped to manufacture 1.5 tons of explosives for five powerful car bombs. The Boeremag allegedly had planned to set the bombs off in Pretoria and Johannesburg in December 2002.
- 2005
- 31 August,Nine Boeremag treason trialists demanded a trial-within-a-trial in Pretoria High Court, claiming prison authorities were behind the disappearance of vital documents.
- 2006
- 17 March,An Imam’s wife tells the Pretoria High Court she saw white men drive a white Volkswagen golf “extremely slowly” past a mosque in Soweto, a week before it was bombed.
- 03 May,Rudi Gouws and Herman van Rooyen escape from custody while on trial at the Pretoria High Court.
- 15 May, The treason trial of the remaining Boeremag accused continues in the Pretoria High Court. Judge Eben Jordaan ordered that the trial continue in the absence of two accused (Gouws and Van Rooyen) who escaped two weeks before the trial resume.
- 19 May, The Boeremag trial marks its third anniversary. South Africa’s first post-apartheid treason trial started on 19 May, 2003 amid high security at the Palace of Justice. It has since moved to the Pretoria High Court for logistical reasons.
-
Boeremag members, Rudi Gouws and Herman van Rooyen after they were recaptured, January 2007. Source: www.mg.co.za
- 2007
- 20 January,Gouws and Van Rooyen are recaptured, and are set to appear in court to face charges of escape and the illegal possession of firearms.
- June, The State finally closes its case after calling 158 witnesses. Numerous legal wrangles, including several applications about the conditions in jail and many dealing with Legal Aid Board disputes, have stretched the trial into one of the longest running criminal trials in South African legal history.
- 05 September,The judge in the Boeremag treason trial rules that enough evidence had been presented by the state on which a reasonable person might convict the 21 accused on charges of high treason, terrorism and sabotage. Judge Eben Jordaan dismissed applications by nine of the accused for their discharge on all of the 42 charges against them.
- 17 September, Defence counsel in the Boeremag treason trial complain bitterly that someone seemed to be listening in on their conversations during private consultations inside the courtroom. One of the defence advocates, Bernard Bantjes, says he had recently found out that private consultations, when the court was not sitting, were allegedly being recorded, sent to a central computer and then erased once a week.
- 02 October, The judge in the Boeremag treason trial on Tuesday urged one of the accused and his legal representative to come to some sort of arrangement after the advocate withdrew from the trial, causing yet a further delay. Advocate Barry van der Merwe, who represented alleged former Boeremag military commander Tom Vorster, withdrew without giving any reasons.
- 2008
- 21 January,One of the Boeremag treason trial accused, Kobus Pretorius, told a Pretoria High Court judge he had had an epiphany in jail and wanted to be released on bail so that he could “serve the community of South Africa”. He told Judge Khami Makhafola he was “a new man” after accepting Jesus Christ as his saviour.
- 07 September,Strijdom Square shooter Barend Strydom tells the Boeremag treason trial that he still believed black people were not human. He was called to the stand in defence of one of the 22 treason-trial accused, Adriaan (At) van Wy.
- 22 December, Gauteng police dismissed media reports that explosives and weapons found on a plot in Rustenburg were linked to the Boeremag.
- 2009
- 05 May,After more than two months in the witness stand, alleged Boeremag leader Tom Vorster told the court he would not testify any further.
- 2010
- 26 August,Jordaan dismisses an application by brothers Herman, Johan and Kobus Pretorius to be declared prisoners of war so that they could be handed over to the SA National Defence Force. They saw themselves as “soldiers in a liberation struggle” embroiled in an armed struggle aimed at self-determination for the “Boerevolk”.
- 2011
- April, The prosecution handed in written heads of argument of over 1 800 pages, summing up the State’s case.
- 31 May,An attempt by five of the 20 Boeremag treason trialists to escape from custody at the Palace of Justice, in Pretoria, is foiled.
- 01 June, The Boeremag treason trial’s oldest accused, Vis Visagie, 72, is rushed to hospital after falling ill in the dock. One of his co-accused, Dr Lets Pretorius, treated Visagie in court, but said tests would have to be done to ascertain what was wrong. Visagie was then taken to hospital.
- 13 June, The North Gauteng High Court, in Pretoria, has ordered that four of the Boeremag treason-trial accused may no longer be held in leg irons overnight.
- 03 July,The Boeremag trial is on hold as the accused spent the day either in their cells or at home celebrating Ascension Day, as they had done in the past few years.
- 23 November,Final legal argument in the Boeremag treason trial is finally concluded in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.
- 2012
- 04 May, A man convicted of harbouring two escaped Boeremag triallists is questioning the Constitutional Court whether they (Herman van Rooyen and Rudolph Gouws) were legally prisoners.
- 16 July, Judge Niel Tuchten dismissed the bail application of Gerhardus “Oom Vis” Visagie on the grounds that he had tried to escape before and might abscond. Visagie is one of 22 accused facing 40 charges ranging from high treason to sabotage and murder.
- 03 May,The Constitutional Court argues on whether the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was wrong to impose a higher sentence on someone convicted of harbouring two of the Boeremag accused.
- 23 July, Details of the Boeremag’s plot to overthrow the African National Congress (ANC) led government, and chase black people and Indians out of the country resumed in the North Gauteng High Court.
- Judge Eben Jordaan started sorting through nine years of legal documents while handing down his judgment in the Boeremag trial.
- 24 July, Details of a five-phase plan to terrorise black South Africans and form a whites-only government were heard on day one in the Boeremag judgment in the North Gauteng High Court.
- Judge Eben Jordaan on Tuesday dismissed claims that the Boeremag accused did not receive a fair trial.
- Judge Eben Jordaan rejects the suggestion by the 22 accused that police informants, who were used as state witnesses, had acted as provocateurs. He said the accused were not put off when they realised that there were informers in their ranks.
- 25 July, Judge Eben Jordaan continues his summary of the case against accused one in the Boeremag trial. The 22 Afrikaner right-wing group members face numerous charges including high treason and terrorism in the North Gauteng High Court.
- Boeremag accused Mike du Toit is identified as a leading member of the right-wing group’s inner circle in the North Gauteng High Court.
- 26 July,The North Gauteng High Court heard how the Boeremag planned to stockpile diesel, food and medical supplies in the run up to their attempted coup. Judge Eben Jordaan starts delivering his judgment in the nine-year-long trial.
- 27 July,Judge Eben Jordaan finds that all the evidence against accused number one, Mike du Toit fitted together like a puzzle.
- Du Toit is found guilty of high treason in the North Gauteng High Court after a marathon nine-year-long trial.
- The brother of Boeremag coup mastermind, Mike du Toit is found guilty of high treason in the North Gauteng High Court. Andre du Toit is linked to the inner circle that would have carried out the plan to overthrow the government.
- 30 July, Boeremag accused Rooikoos du Plessis is found guilty of high treason in the North Gauteng High Court on Monday. Judge Eben Jordaan spent the last week delivering his ruling in the nine-year-long marathon trial.
- 31 July, Boeremag accused Adriaan van Wyk is found guilty of treason in the North Gauteng High Court. According to Judge Eben Jordaan, van Wyk was a member of the Boeremag’s inner-circle and was a leader in its central combat force.
- 3 August, Boeremag leader Tom Vorster’s coup plans included blowing up Parliament, the SABC, the SA Reserve Bank headquarters and the Johannesburg Stock Exchange on the same day, the court heard.
- 13 August, Judgment in the treason trial of a group of Afrikaner right-wingers was postponed in the High Court in Pretoria.
- 20 August, The last accused in the Boeremag treason trial in the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, is found guilty of treason. Kobus Pretorius admitted he was wrong and has apologised to the country.
- 2013
- 29 October, The leader of the Boeremag, a right wing Afrikaner organisation involved in sabotage,Tom Vorster and five members of its bomb squad which blew up numerous targets in 2002 were sentenced to an effective 25 years’ imprisonment by the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria. Bombers Herman van Rooyen, Johan and Wilhelm Pretorius, and Rudi Gouws received the same sentences as Vorster. The third Pretorius brother, master bomb maker Kobus Pretorius, was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment, of which 10 years were suspended.
- Boeremag leaders Mike du Toit, Dirk Hanekom and the Pretorius brothers’ father, Dr Lets Pretorius, were each sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment, of which 10 years were conditionally suspended for five years. Mike du Toit’s right-hand man, Andre du Toit, and Dion van den Heever were sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment of which 10 years were suspended.
- Rooikoos du Plessis and Jurie Vermeulen, who also played important roles in planning the coup, got 15 years’ imprisonment, of which 10 were suspended. One of the Boeremag’s most active members and the Boeremag chaplain, 74-year-old Vis Visagie, was sentenced to five years of correctional supervision.
- Five of the Boeremag members who played a lesser role, including the youngest member Jacques Jordaan, walked out of the court free men after being given suspended sentences. They are Adriaan van Wyk and former defence force officers Giel Burger, Jacques Olivier, and Pieter van Deventer.
• News24, (2004) ‘Boeremag: ‘Prayers, then bombs’, 28 March, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• Mail & Guardian, (2004) ‘Boeremag trial delayed after leader takes a fall’, 08 October, [online], available at www.mg.co.za(Accessed: 06 August 2012)
• Mail & Guardian, (2004) ‘Boeremag trial: Mystery witness named’, 19 October, [online], available at www.mg.co.za(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• News24, (2004) ‘Boeremag trialist has breakdown’,04 October, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• News24, (2005) ‘Boeremag trial hits new snag’, 31 August, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 06 August 2012)
• Venter Z. (2006) ‘
Boeremag trial marks its third year’, from Independent Online, 19 May, [online], available at www.iol.co.za(Accessed: 08 August 2012)• News24,(2006), ‘Boeremag trial drawing to a close’, 17 March, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 07 August 2012)
• News24,(2006), ‘Boeremag trial hears of bombs’, 17 March, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 07 August 2012)
• Mail & Guardian, (2008)‘Barend Strydom testifies in Boeremag trial’07 August, [online], available at www.mg.co.za(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• Censorburgbear Reports, (2009) ‘Why are those Boeremag accused still sitting in jail?’, 31 December, [online], available at http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• News24, (2010) ‘Boeremag trial nears judgement’, 23 November, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 06 August 2012)
• Venter Z. (2011),
‘Boeremag trial on hold’, from Independent Online, 3 June, [online], available at www.iol.co.za(Accessed: 07 August 2012)• Mail & Guardian,(2011) ‘Govt told to remove Boeremag accused’s night-time leg irons’, 13 June, [online], available at www.mg.co.za(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• Mail & Guardian,(2011) ‘Epic Boeremag trial draws to a close’, [online], available at www.mg.co.za(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• Moselakgomo A. (2012) ‘Free me, says Boeremag man’, from Sowetan, 03 May, [online], available at www.sowetanlive.co.za(Accessed: 07 August 2012)
• Pretoria News, (2012) ‘Boeremag harboured: man fights conviction’, 04 May, [online], available at www.iol.co.za(Accessed: 07 August 2012)
• Bateman B. (2012) ‘Judgment in Boeremag trial underway’, from Eye Witness News, 23 July, [online], available at www.traffic.ewn.co.za(Accessed: 05 August 2012)
• City Press, (2012) ‘Boeremag trial judgment gets under way’, 23 July, [online], available at www.citypress.co.za(Accessed: 08 August 2012)
• SABC News, (2012),‘Last Boeremag found guilty, apologises’, 20 August, [online], available at www.sabc.co.za(Accessed: 22 August 2012)
• News24, (2013), “Sentences handed down to Boeremag accused” 29 October, [online], available at www.news24.com(Accessed: 29 October 2013)
ONAFHANKLIK 
[…] Boervin – Prisoners – GevangenisBoeremag verhoor – 23 Maart 2019Boeremag – South Africa […]
LikeLike